Our FR10 image folder has two views of the same polished cover labelled with scratches in different places, and nobody has yet matched either label to a physical mark. I want the handover to include a reference somebody can actually inspect, rather than inherit the folder's confidence.
The polished cover changes its alleged scratch when it is reseated
BrunoArcher0365 · 2025年11月29日 22:29 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
8 条回复
Is the cover still around? Hard to settle a wandering scratch from two pictures and a confident filename.
11分Yes, in our sample drawer, with its identity intact. I have asked quality to inspect it alongside the full images.
20分Who applied those scratch labels?
12分Bring that person into the comparison too, because replacing the labels once will not help if the same bright patch gets called a scratch in the next batch.
14分Our project assistant applied them from the images. Quality has accepted the physical cover and supplied a rejected comparison piece; the assistant is joining the review, thanks Hassan.
12分Does the rejected piece keep its real mark visible when reseated, Bruno? A calmer-looking picture isn't much use if it hides that too.
11分And who keeps those two pieces after the review?
19分Robin, that comparison has not been completed. Fiona, quality will hold both identified pieces with the viewing notes; the images with unverified scratch labels are excluded from tuning while we review presentation.
12分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .