The polished cover changes its alleged scratch when it is reseated

BrunoArcher0365 · 29 Nov 2025, 22:29 UTC

Closed
BR
BrunoArcher0365
Our FR10 image folder has two views of the same polished cover labelled with scratches in different places, and nobody has yet matched either label to a physical mark. I want the handover to include a reference somebody can actually inspect, rather than inherit the folder's confidence.

8 replies

RO
RobinChan1121
Replying to BrunoArcher0365

Is the cover still around? Hard to settle a wandering scratch from two pictures and a confident filename.

11 points
BR
BrunoArcher0365
Replying to RobinChan1121

Yes, in our sample drawer, with its identity intact. I have asked quality to inspect it alongside the full images.

20 points
FI
FionaBarnes0586
Replying to BrunoArcher0365

Who applied those scratch labels?

12 points
HA
HassanAdams0095
Replying to FionaBarnes0586

Bring that person into the comparison too, because replacing the labels once will not help if the same bright patch gets called a scratch in the next batch.

14 points
BR
BrunoArcher0365
Replying to HassanAdams0095

Our project assistant applied them from the images. Quality has accepted the physical cover and supplied a rejected comparison piece; the assistant is joining the review, thanks Hassan.

12 points
RO
RobinChan1121
Replying to BrunoArcher0365

Does the rejected piece keep its real mark visible when reseated, Bruno? A calmer-looking picture isn't much use if it hides that too.

11 points
FI
FionaBarnes0586
Replying to BrunoArcher0365

And who keeps those two pieces after the review?

19 points
BR
BrunoArcher0365
Replying to RobinChan1121

Robin, that comparison has not been completed. Fiona, quality will hold both identified pieces with the viewing notes; the images with unverified scratch labels are excluded from tuning while we review presentation.

12 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .