简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Fairino FR10: One item, several inspections, an inflated total

JamieAli0208 · 2026年6月5日 19:09 UTC

回复讨论
JA
JamieAli0208
I'm reconciling our batch of 162 for per-item inspection with Fairino FR10 in a fixture inspection station with item labels, using an inspection coupon. The dashboard looks nearly finished because its post-restart counter includes repeat inspections. Items can have failed checks followed by reviewed retries. I want the accepted-item count to be accurate without discarding that attempt history.

14 条回复

NA
NadiaBrown0900

Can you follow one labeled item through its attempts? Compare successful-attempt count with its actual accepted disposition.

17
JA
JamieAli0208

I've traced one item in our saved history and found several successful attempts with the same identity. Our counter adds each success, inflating the apparent batch progress.

18
NA
NadiaBrown0900

Rebuild an offline total from item dispositions, keeping attempts underneath. Counting each accepted identity once should give you the right batch total.

15
RE
ReeceChen1167

Your counting rule needs the current disposition. Deduplicating all identities with any successful attempt would still include an item whose disposition was subsequently changed to rejected.

1
NA
NadiaBrown0900

@ReeceChen1167 Right. I should've said current authorized disposition. Keep the full history, but count an item only if its current disposition makes it accepted for this batch.

17
JA
JamieAli0208

For an item that fails and then gains reviewed acceptance, should the report count one accepted item while preserving both inspection attempts beneath it?

14
NA
NadiaBrown0900

@JamieAli0208 Yes. Attempts explain its history; current disposition determines whether that item contributes to accepted quantity.

20
ZA
ZaraBarnes0569

On my report, we put attempts and accepted items beside each other. People stopped expecting the numbers to match once the repeated inspections were visible.

17
IS
IsaacBrown0955

@ZaraBarnes0569 Does a retry get a new item ID then? Or just a new attempt ID?

16
NA
NadiaBrown0900

Same physical item, same item identity. The distinct inspection gets its own attempt identity, linked back to that item.

21
JA
JamieAli0208

The newer entries distinguish item and attempt identity, but some older results lack the item link needed to include them reliably in an accepted-item total.

15
RE
ReeceChen1167

@JamieAli0208 Avoid inferring unique items solely from event order; those unidentified results might contain repeated attempts against the same physical item.

-2
JA
JamieAli0208

@ReeceChen1167 The report's counting basis is clear: use current accepted dispositions per item, preserving all attempts. Completing the fix still depends on traceable reconciliation and a consistent offline restart result.

6
NA
NadiaBrown0900

@JamieAli0208 That rule preserves the inspection history and gives the total a clear basis, with reconciliation still required for closure.

6

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。