Fairino FR10: One item, several inspections, an inflated total

JamieAli0208 · 5 Jun 2026, 19:09 UTC

Reply to discussion
JA
JamieAli0208
I'm reconciling our batch of 162 for per-item inspection with Fairino FR10 in a fixture inspection station with item labels, using an inspection coupon. The dashboard looks nearly finished because its post-restart counter includes repeat inspections. Items can have failed checks followed by reviewed retries. I want the accepted-item count to be accurate without discarding that attempt history.

14 replies

NA
NadiaBrown0900
Replying to JamieAli0208

Can you follow one labeled item through its attempts? Compare successful-attempt count with its actual accepted disposition.

17 points
JA
JamieAli0208
Replying to NadiaBrown0900

I've traced one item in our saved history and found several successful attempts with the same identity. Our counter adds each success, inflating the apparent batch progress.

18 points
NA
NadiaBrown0900
Replying to JamieAli0208

Rebuild an offline total from item dispositions, keeping attempts underneath. Counting each accepted identity once should give you the right batch total.

15 points
RE
ReeceChen1167
Replying to NadiaBrown0900

Your counting rule needs the current disposition. Deduplicating all identities with any successful attempt would still include an item whose disposition was subsequently changed to rejected.

1 points
NA
NadiaBrown0900
Replying to ReeceChen1167

@ReeceChen1167 Right. I should've said current authorized disposition. Keep the full history, but count an item only if its current disposition makes it accepted for this batch.

17 points
JA
JamieAli0208
Replying to NadiaBrown0900

For an item that fails and then gains reviewed acceptance, should the report count one accepted item while preserving both inspection attempts beneath it?

14 points
NA
NadiaBrown0900
Replying to JamieAli0208

@JamieAli0208 Yes. Attempts explain its history; current disposition determines whether that item contributes to accepted quantity.

20 points
ZA
ZaraBarnes0569
Replying to NadiaBrown0900

On my report, we put attempts and accepted items beside each other. People stopped expecting the numbers to match once the repeated inspections were visible.

17 points
IS
IsaacBrown0955
Replying to ZaraBarnes0569

@ZaraBarnes0569 Does a retry get a new item ID then? Or just a new attempt ID?

16 points
NA
NadiaBrown0900
Replying to IsaacBrown0955

Same physical item, same item identity. The distinct inspection gets its own attempt identity, linked back to that item.

21 points
JA
JamieAli0208
Replying to NadiaBrown0900

The newer entries distinguish item and attempt identity, but some older results lack the item link needed to include them reliably in an accepted-item total.

15 points
RE
ReeceChen1167
Replying to JamieAli0208

@JamieAli0208 Avoid inferring unique items solely from event order; those unidentified results might contain repeated attempts against the same physical item.

-2 points
JA
JamieAli0208
Replying to ReeceChen1167

@ReeceChen1167 The report's counting basis is clear: use current accepted dispositions per item, preserving all attempts. Completing the fix still depends on traceable reconciliation and a consistent offline restart result.

6 points
NA
NadiaBrown0900
Replying to JamieAli0208

@JamieAli0208 That rule preserves the inspection history and gives the total a clear basis, with reconciliation still required for closure.

6 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.