简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
LouisArcher0398 · 2026年8月1日 05:34 UTC
Preserve the current program and adjustment history, then inspect the as-found tool and presentation under your maintenance procedure. Start with what is physically different, not a theory about arm drift based on the place where you notice the miss.
12分Compare the spacer against its intended contacts in the fingers and tray, because a familiar-looking tray can still hold a part differently
0分In my spacer case the pad change improved a limited comparison, but changeover was still open. Is yours tied to a tray change or does it worsen within the same setup?
12分Don't make pad wear the default answer from Rachel's example. I had a height mismatch discussed on another grip problem while the tray check was still missing. The two observations didn't magically become one cause.
18分I read Rachel as asking about timing, Leon, not diagnosing the fingers from a different machine
0分Fair, Zara. I read more into it than she said. The timing question is useful.
9分I can't separate within-run changes from changeovers in the current notes. We wrote down offsets, not tray identities.
7分Have the maintenance inspection preserve that uncertainty. Or rather, don't let the new tray register imply the earlier tray identities have been recovered.
15分For the next approved comparison, keep identified spacers and tray positions with the physical inspection results and the exact program revision used. You can then compare like with like. If someone cleans a seat, reseats a finger and changes an offset between observations, record all three; an improved pickup would not isolate which change mattered.
3分Have the toolmaker confirm the intended contact arrangement as well, especially if there is no trustworthy as-built record to compare the current fingers with
6分Maintenance found one tray not fully against its locating face. Fingers haven't been assessed yet.
25分Was that tray linked to a recorded bad pickup, or found during the general check? Different weight of evidence.
19分General check. It isn't tied to the earlier misses. We have corrected its seating under the procedure.
10分Then tell the next shift about the seating finding without promising you've explained all the offset changes
7分And make sure the corrected seat is recognisable. A note saying seat correctly isn't much use if the locating face is hidden once the tray is installed.
1分Has the tool inspection produced anything else, or is that still waiting?
24分No finger defect established. The limited comparison after seating correction looked better; replacement-tray checks still need doing.
10分Which pickup revision was used for that comparison? The accumulated compensation matters. A squarer grip with the latest edited points is not automatically evidence that the original points would work after correcting the tray seat.
2分Latest saved revision, not the original. Thank you, Anil; I've added that to the result before the teaching team reads it.
8分