The labelled cartons in our UR5e proposal turn their bearing edges over lower-layer gaps. Packaging has a support section, but tooling uses a different gap arrangement for finger withdrawal. I need a shared review of the actual filled carton and placement order before either drawing becomes the accepted pattern.
Which lower-layer section should support our UR5e turned cartons?
TheoAbbott0062 · 2026年3月29日 09:50 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
5 条回复
Overlay those two arrangements with their revisions. Make the disagreement visible before asking for another approval.
9分The overlay shows packaging's support occupying the proposed finger channel. Both reviewers now have the same filled-carton section and complete tool drawing.
4分Has the combined review produced a workable alternative?
14分The turned arrangement is rejected. A lower-count straight candidate has acceptable support, but its last-carton withdrawal still needs checking. Dispatch is pricing the additional pallet changes alongside that work.
14分Keep those extra changes in the decision even if the tool route comes back clear.
6分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .