The labelled cartons in our UR5e proposal turn their bearing edges over lower-layer gaps. Packaging has a support section, but tooling uses a different gap arrangement for finger withdrawal. I need a shared review of the actual filled carton and placement order before either drawing becomes the accepted pattern.
Which lower-layer section should support our UR5e turned cartons?
TheoAbbott0062 · 29 Mar 2026, 09:50 UTC
5 replies
Replying to TheoAbbott0062
Overlay those two arrangements with their revisions. Make the disagreement visible before asking for another approval.
9pointsReplying to SarahBaker0502
The overlay shows packaging's support occupying the proposed finger channel. Both reviewers now have the same filled-carton section and complete tool drawing.
4pointsReplying to TheoAbbott0062
Has the combined review produced a workable alternative?
14pointsReplying to SarahBaker0502
The turned arrangement is rejected. A lower-count straight candidate has acceptable support, but its last-carton withdrawal still needs checking. Dispatch is pricing the additional pallet changes alongside that work.
14pointsReplying to TheoAbbott0062
Keep those extra changes in the decision even if the tool route comes back clear.
6pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .