简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Would a stronger clamp hide a locating problem? (Fairino FR10)

WillBaker0487 · 2026年7月10日 18:00 UTC

回复讨论
WI
WillBaker0487
Our proposed nest for Fairino FR10 doing presenting mounting brackets for inspection in a machined-bracket assembly workshop contacts several surfaces on a steel sensor bracket. CAD looks tidy, but my bench samples don't all sit the same way. Someone suggested a stronger clamp. How do I check whether the locating scheme is fighting itself before we approve tooling?

4 条回复

HA
HazelAdams0136

@WillBaker0487 Start by identifying the contacts that establish the required drawing datums. A map distinguishing them from supports and clamps will help interpret your rocking samples.

11
WI
WillBaker0487

@HazelAdams0136 On my sketch, the mounting holes and outside wall both determine lateral position. Everything is labelled as a locator, with no stated priority between those contacts.

10
HA
HazelAdams0136

Show the fixture designer where those constraints overlap, alongside the permitted hole-to-wall relationship. A relieved wall contact is one candidate for their review.

17
TH
ThomasArcher0364

@HazelAdams0136 That proposal depends on the required datum scheme. Without establishing it, relieving the wall might remove the reference needed by the operation.

-6

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。