Our proposed sleeve tool has left bands on the anodised surface in the bench photos. Supplier says softer pads. Maybe, but nobody has agreed whether these bands fail our finish requirement, and the proposal says nothing about a sleeve sticking during release. What would make this a proper comparison?
Cannot choose the softer UR5e sleeve pads from these photographs
EmmaArcher0376 · 2025年11月10日 15:27 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
7 条回复
Have quality judge the identified sleeves first. What was their condition before the bench handling?
17分We have arrival photographs, but not enough to pair every handled sleeve with a before view. I've asked quality for a fresh identified comparison set and the viewing method.
17分Try that agreed comparison before purchasing pad stock. Ask the supplier to show holding and release with representative sleeves, not simply send a softer-looking material sample.
7分Jane, include the receiving tray. A free release above a bench misses the actual placement.
5分Yes, the receiving arrangement belongs in it. And ask how the proposed pads are cleaned and replaced so the first pristine set isn't the only condition considered.
13分Quality has set the appearance comparison. Supplier's new bench report covers holding, but release into our tray is still missing. Thanks Jane; neither pad is selected from the appearance pictures alone.
11分Did they explain the omitted release check, or just leave it out again?
12分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .