简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Cannot choose the softer UR5e sleeve pads from these photographs

EmmaArcher0376 · 2025年11月10日 15:27 UTC

已关闭
EM
EmmaArcher0376
Our proposed sleeve tool has left bands on the anodised surface in the bench photos. Supplier says softer pads. Maybe, but nobody has agreed whether these bands fail our finish requirement, and the proposal says nothing about a sleeve sticking during release. What would make this a proper comparison?

7 条回复

DA
DanielAli0217

Have quality judge the identified sleeves first. What was their condition before the bench handling?

17
EM
EmmaArcher0376

We have arrival photographs, but not enough to pair every handled sleeve with a before view. I've asked quality for a fresh identified comparison set and the viewing method.

17
JA
JaneBrooks0858

Try that agreed comparison before purchasing pad stock. Ask the supplier to show holding and release with representative sleeves, not simply send a softer-looking material sample.

7
DA
DanielAli0217

Jane, include the receiving tray. A free release above a bench misses the actual placement.

5
JA
JaneBrooks0858

Yes, the receiving arrangement belongs in it. And ask how the proposed pads are cleaned and replaced so the first pristine set isn't the only condition considered.

13
EM
EmmaArcher0376

Quality has set the appearance comparison. Supplier's new bench report covers holding, but release into our tray is still missing. Thanks Jane; neither pad is selected from the appearance pictures alone.

11
DA
DanielAli0217

Did they explain the omitted release check, or just leave it out again?

12

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .