Our proposed sleeve tool has left bands on the anodised surface in the bench photos. Supplier says softer pads. Maybe, but nobody has agreed whether these bands fail our finish requirement, and the proposal says nothing about a sleeve sticking during release. What would make this a proper comparison?
Cannot choose the softer UR5e sleeve pads from these photographs
EmmaArcher0376 · 10 Nov 2025, 15:27 UTC
7 replies
Replying to EmmaArcher0376
Have quality judge the identified sleeves first. What was their condition before the bench handling?
17pointsReplying to DanielAli0217
We have arrival photographs, but not enough to pair every handled sleeve with a before view. I've asked quality for a fresh identified comparison set and the viewing method.
17pointsReplying to EmmaArcher0376
Try that agreed comparison before purchasing pad stock. Ask the supplier to show holding and release with representative sleeves, not simply send a softer-looking material sample.
7pointsReplying to JaneBrooks0858
Jane, include the receiving tray. A free release above a bench misses the actual placement.
5pointsReplying to DanielAli0217
Yes, the receiving arrangement belongs in it. And ask how the proposed pads are cleaned and replaced so the first pristine set isn't the only condition considered.
13pointsReplying to JaneBrooks0858
Quality has set the appearance comparison. Supplier's new bench report covers holding, but release into our tray is still missing. Thanks Jane; neither pad is selected from the appearance pictures alone.
11pointsReplying to EmmaArcher0376
Did they explain the omitted release check, or just leave it out again?
12pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .