Need an agreed finish check before buying pads for our FR10 bezel transfer. One inspector rejects a faint ring, another wipes it and passes it. Supplier wants us to order softer pads. We haven't even agreed whether wiping belongs in the inspection method, never mind whether the new pad releases cleanly.
softer pads, same argument over the finish
AnilBell0636 · 2025年8月9日 09:03 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
3 条回复
回复 AnilBell0636
I'd ask quality to settle the handling and viewing method using identified samples first, including whether that wipe is permitted; otherwise you'll buy the next pads and have exactly the same argument, just with another invoice attached.
6分Quality wants untouched samples alongside any cleaned ones. Good. Asked the supplier for pad details and representative transfers into our tray, with samples kept identifiable. No pad order yet.
21分回复 AnilBell0636
Will they price that trial separately from the pads? Might be worth paying for a useful comparison, but I'd want its agreed scope rather than another video of a bezel held above a bench.
8分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .