简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Which coupon attempt owns the FR10 completion retained through disconnection?

CarlaArcher0401 · 2026年7月2日 19:55 UTC

回复讨论
CA
CarlaArcher0401
Our FR10 fixture-check monitor counts a completion again on reconnect although the indication was already high. How should I match it to its original attempt without clearing it or resending work?

12 条回复

LU
LucyBell0654

Check the retained identity and result beside the processing history that survives restart. The first high state after reconnect is an observation of retained data, not proof that a new job just completed.

18
CA
CarlaArcher0401

The retained record has a unique attempt identity and coupon link. Our saved detail row already contains that result once, but the displayed total increments when the monitor sees high after connecting.

18
JO
JonasAdams0111

Then fix the total's source rather than disturb the PLC state to make the screen's arithmetic behave

21
AN
AnnaCarter1025

Does the total mean completed attempts or accepted coupons? The same stored result can support a technical completion count without establishing the coupon's current quality disposition.

4
ZA
ZaraArcher0395

Replay the saved records first. Can the expected total be rebuilt without a live connection?

25
CA
CarlaArcher0401

Anna, this screen explicitly reports completed attempts; quality dispositions are elsewhere. Zara, the replay rebuilds the expected total from distinct durable attempt rows. We have stopped incrementing a separate number just because the retained bit is high.

2
LU
LucyBell0654

Include a completion first discovered after disconnection too. Reconnect must not add a duplicate, but it still needs to record genuinely new identified results that arrived while the monitor was absent.

14
JO
JonasAdams0111

And reopening should derive the same result, not restore yesterday's separate counter from another file

23
CA
CarlaArcher0401

Both pass in the replay: repeated retained result stays one row, and a newly discovered identified completion adds one row and one completed attempt. Reopening rebuilds the same total. The old standalone counter is no longer read.

8
AN
AnnaCarter1025

Have those tests used the actual retained-record format from your documented interface? A convenient fake identity would test the counter while leaving the real input path unexamined.

25
CA
CarlaArcher0401

Yes, saved records from the installed interface, then the maintainer repeated the reconnect comparison through the normal monitor. Counts match the durable rows after reopening. Thanks Anna; the screen label remains completed attempts, not accepted coupons.

12
LU
LucyBell0654

Keep that distinction and the newly discovered-result test in the handover. The fix now accounts for both replayed history and work first observed after reconnect, without changing the job's physical state.

22

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。