Which coupon attempt owns the FR10 completion retained through disconnection?

CarlaArcher0401 · 2 Jul 2026, 19:55 UTC

Reply to discussion
CA
CarlaArcher0401
Our FR10 fixture-check monitor counts a completion again on reconnect although the indication was already high. How should I match it to its original attempt without clearing it or resending work?

12 replies

LU
LucyBell0654
Replying to CarlaArcher0401

Check the retained identity and result beside the processing history that survives restart. The first high state after reconnect is an observation of retained data, not proof that a new job just completed.

18 points
CA
CarlaArcher0401
Replying to LucyBell0654

The retained record has a unique attempt identity and coupon link. Our saved detail row already contains that result once, but the displayed total increments when the monitor sees high after connecting.

18 points
JO
JonasAdams0111
Replying to CarlaArcher0401

Then fix the total's source rather than disturb the PLC state to make the screen's arithmetic behave

21 points
AN
AnnaCarter1025
Replying to CarlaArcher0401

Does the total mean completed attempts or accepted coupons? The same stored result can support a technical completion count without establishing the coupon's current quality disposition.

4 points
ZA
ZaraArcher0395
Replying to CarlaArcher0401

Replay the saved records first. Can the expected total be rebuilt without a live connection?

25 points
CA
CarlaArcher0401
Replying to CarlaArcher0401

Anna, this screen explicitly reports completed attempts; quality dispositions are elsewhere. Zara, the replay rebuilds the expected total from distinct durable attempt rows. We have stopped incrementing a separate number just because the retained bit is high.

2 points
LU
LucyBell0654
Replying to CarlaArcher0401

Include a completion first discovered after disconnection too. Reconnect must not add a duplicate, but it still needs to record genuinely new identified results that arrived while the monitor was absent.

14 points
JO
JonasAdams0111
Replying to CarlaArcher0401

And reopening should derive the same result, not restore yesterday's separate counter from another file

23 points
CA
CarlaArcher0401
Replying to LucyBell0654

Both pass in the replay: repeated retained result stays one row, and a newly discovered identified completion adds one row and one completed attempt. Reopening rebuilds the same total. The old standalone counter is no longer read.

8 points
AN
AnnaCarter1025
Replying to CarlaArcher0401

Have those tests used the actual retained-record format from your documented interface? A convenient fake identity would test the counter while leaving the real input path unexamined.

25 points
CA
CarlaArcher0401
Replying to AnnaCarter1025

Yes, saved records from the installed interface, then the maintainer repeated the reconnect comparison through the normal monitor. Counts match the durable rows after reopening. Thanks Anna; the screen label remains completed attempts, not accepted coupons.

12 points
LU
LucyBell0654
Replying to CarlaArcher0401

Keep that distinction and the newly discovered-result test in the handover. The fix now accounts for both replayed history and work first observed after reconnect, without changing the job's physical state.

22 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.