简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

What should count as dimensional acceptance after welding? (Universal Robots UR5e)

SamAllen0333 · 2026年5月5日 03:33 UTC

回复讨论
SA
SamAllen0333
We're planning preparing robotic welding of gusseted brackets with Universal Robots UR5e on a gusseted angle-bracket assembly in a small steel assemblies factory. Our old inspection notes say it looks aligned while restrained, then falls outside the drawing requirement after release. I want to untangle fit-up, fixture location and final inspection before our new cell inherits an unexplained correction routine. This is a records review, not live welding adjustment.

4 条回复

DA
DavidAbbott0084

Does the inspection procedure define the released condition and reference supports? Check that alongside whether each old measurement says how the assembly was held.

19
SA
SamAllen0333

@DavidAbbott0084 The sheets mix clamped checks and released measurements. Some don't say which. The drawing has the dimension, but our procedure leaves the support condition vague.

2
DA
DavidAbbott0084

@SamAllen0333 Ask quality and the design owner to establish the intended acceptance condition, then group historical results by their documented measurement state to support comparison.

6
OS
OscarChen1141

@DavidAbbott0084 Same restraint label still doesn't mean comparable. Unknown supports and mixed fixture or process revisions could remain inside those groups.

1

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。