简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
HazelBarnes0571 · 2026年9月4日 21:49 UTC
A view of each carton base against the actual support beneath it, with the packing requirement marked. How much of the disagreement is overhang beyond the load, and how much is a gap inside it? Those aren't interchangeable drawings.
9分Both occur. The outer corners overhang, while one long base edge spans an internal gap.
7分Mark those as separate conditions on the review. The packaging person can then assess each support question while the integrator checks the tool's approach and release against the same carton positions. A top view alone hides the underside contact.
2分Does the pattern include the actual pallet deck, or does the drawing treat it as a continuous surface?
4分Include that too. First-layer support comes from the pallet, while higher layers sit on cases or sheets. Whoever reviews the proposal needs to know which interface they're approving instead of calling the entire stack one pattern.
13分I'd also show where the operator stands to deal with a rejected carton. The outside edge is often where that recovery happens.
12分Agreed, with that recovery arrangement reviewed for the cell. But don't move the carton positions to create access without returning the revised support layout to packaging; fixing one drawing can invalidate the answer on another.
7分The deck is only a rectangle. I've requested its real construction and the carton support views.
25分Are the packed cartons the same size as those in the sketch? I mean their actual filled dimensions, including any bulge. Our nominal case drawing understated the footprint at the middle of each side.
0分I only have the nominal drawing. Added filled-carton measurements to the request. Thanks for spotting that.
12分