Our UR5e pallet drawing now marks the carton support strips. Packaging wants the gaps closed under the rotated boxes. The tooling supplier wants those same gaps for finger withdrawal. I need a usable pattern, not another drawing passed between them
the carton pattern leaves nowhere for the fingers
SarahBarnes0589 · 2025年10月30日 08:43 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
5 条回复
Put both proposed changes on the same revision, because each supplier can make their own drawing look right while leaving the other one impossible.
24分They have the same revision. They disagree about which requirement changes. I am asking who develops the alternatives, not which attachment to send
2分Then the integrator needs to bring alternative patterns or tooling arrangements to both reviewers, and I would not choose a compromise gap from the desk just to get an answer back.
23分Integrator has proposed a different layer arrangement. Packaging is checking support and the tool supplier is checking withdrawal on that one. It uses fewer cartons per layer, which has made the production meeting lively
3分Fewer per layer might still be the useful option, but ask production what that changes over a full pallet and a normal shift before anyone calls it too slow.
25分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .