简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
AaronBaker0436 · 2025年9月8日 09:46 UTC
Use the fixture marking with a setup photo, occurrence time and active program step. Can maintenance link any existing event to a known fixture, rather than guessing which one appears in the old clip?
7分Only the latest event. Fixture U8 is identifiable and the step waits for unload position. I've separated the older clips because their fixtures are uncertain.
15分Ask the technician what supplies unload position for that step. Then local maintenance can capture the named condition and compare it with U8, instead of inspecting every bit of tooling equally.
14分They named the input and requested its state with the wait. Shift lead has the request and U8 photograph. Thanks for narrowing that down.
19分Is that request in the shared handover too?
22分Yes, Alex. Lead owns the capture on either shift. We have a paired event now: U8 in position visually, expected confirmation absent.
18分Have maintenance inspect the source of that confirmation and its mounting. Keep the captured state with the report; the visual position alone doesn't tell you where the signal was lost.
11分Maintenance found a cracked target mount. Replacement is being arranged, followed by the agreed fixture-exchange check. We haven't got a successful trial to add yet.
21分Will the replacement mount have an updated reference in the fixture record?
18分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .