简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Puck tilting despite the FR10 pickup edits

LouisAli0224 · 2025年11月1日 11:48 UTC

已关闭
LO
LouisAli0224
Our FR10 puck grip looks less square after several point edits. What physical observation should I capture first?

19 条回复

MI
MiaChan1079

Capture when the tilt begins. Is the puck already leaning in the tray, pushed over as the fingers close, or moving after lift? Keep the tray and tool contacts visible, not just the arm.

11
LO
LouisAli0224

It rocks as the second finger closes. Looks flat before contact.

17
NO
NoahArcher0368

Let the operator who noticed it show maintenance. On our training jobs that person often knows which row or changeover makes it worse, then gets left out while everyone discusses the robot.

22
CH
ChenBarnes0529

Which pickup version made that clip? I'd keep the versions identifiable while the physical checks happen, otherwise a good-looking result later becomes hard to explain.

11
LO
LouisAli0224

Version 7. Operator says it began after a finger replacement, but edits started earlier.

19
MI
MiaChan1079

So there may be two periods to understand. Have maintenance compare the fitted pair and mounting faces with the intended drawing. Don't assume the replacement explains complaints that predate it.

16
RA
RachelBrooks0870

Can the operator see the finger difference from the loading side? I ask because a check sheet can tell somebody to inspect a contact that disappears behind the tool as soon as it is fitted.

6
NO
NoahArcher0368

Rachel, exactly. We once moved the useful photograph to the operator's side of a fixture and suddenly the same instruction became understandable. No extra paragraph needed.

11
LO
LouisAli0224

The rear contact is hidden from loading. Maintenance can inspect it during the tooling check.

5
CH
ChenBarnes0529

Noah, did moving the photograph solve the visibility or just explain what to look for? I'd be wary of making a hidden contact seem inspectable because the picture is good.

13
NO
NoahArcher0368

It explained a contact that was visible from that side on ours. It would not solve Louis's hidden one. That needs a workable check, not a better photograph of an inaccessible surface.

11
MI
MiaChan1079

For this investigation maintenance can inspect the dismantled tool. The eventual operator check is a separate design question. Both matter, but we don't have to answer them with the same viewpoint.

18
LO
LouisAli0224

Maintenance found the replacement finger sits against a raised burr on its mounting face. Repair arranged.

12
RA
RachelBrooks0870

That gives the designer something specific for the future check. Ask what verifies correct assembly after replacement, rather than ask the operator to see the hidden contact every cycle.

11
CH
ChenBarnes0529

Has the repaired pair been tried through the full transfer yet, Louis?

15
LO
LouisAli0224

Not yet. Burr removed and pair checked. Programmer reviewing versions before the transfer trial.

9
MI
MiaChan1079

Keep the earlier complaint open in the notes. A mounting fault can explain the newer tilt without explaining why someone first started adjusting the pickup.

9
LO
LouisAli0224

Will do. Thanks for separating those. I was about to call the whole history explained.

3
RA
RachelBrooks0870

And give the operator the result when the trial happens. They spotted the visible change; they should not have to guess whether the latest program has merely disguised it again.

18

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .