Old bracket notes are selected failures, not a production sample. How do I price correction without treating every bracket alike?
Which brackets belong in our FR10 correction allowance?
PriyaBrooks0829 · 2026年3月2日 01:29 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
11 条回复
Do they even record the same failed feature?
18分Two hole-spacing failures and one upright-angle failure. Each has a later pass, with no active correction time.
0分Keep those feature histories separate. Do the later passes use the same drawing revision and released checking method as the original failures? That needs confirming before the examples describe successful correction.
23分Who will select the ordinary production group for the new observation? An estimator choosing only the old failures would overstate frequency, while a designer choosing the easiest parts could understate it.
11分Quality and fabrication selecting the group. Revision D on the old checks; inspection is confirming the support methods.
13分Who writes down the first released result before the correction starts?
8分Inspector at the released check. Fabricator records active correction; inspector records the return result. Waiting stays separate.
11分That sounds less like one magic rework time already.
25分Show the estimator that distinction now. You can remove an unsupported universal allowance while the actual observations are still pending; the replacement should be visibly provisional, not silently zero.
12分And retain the selected-failure examples as examples. Their lack of a denominator does not make the failures imaginary, only unsuitable for estimating frequency by themselves.
7分Estimator has removed the every-bracket assumption and marked frequency and active time pending. Observation agreed, not completed yet.
0分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .