Which brackets belong in our FR10 correction allowance?
PriyaBrooks0829 · 2 Mar 2026, 01:29 UTC
11 replies
Do they even record the same failed feature?
18pointsTwo hole-spacing failures and one upright-angle failure. Each has a later pass, with no active correction time.
0pointsKeep those feature histories separate. Do the later passes use the same drawing revision and released checking method as the original failures? That needs confirming before the examples describe successful correction.
23pointsWho will select the ordinary production group for the new observation? An estimator choosing only the old failures would overstate frequency, while a designer choosing the easiest parts could understate it.
11pointsQuality and fabrication selecting the group. Revision D on the old checks; inspection is confirming the support methods.
13pointsWho writes down the first released result before the correction starts?
8pointsInspector at the released check. Fabricator records active correction; inspector records the return result. Waiting stays separate.
11pointsThat sounds less like one magic rework time already.
25pointsShow the estimator that distinction now. You can remove an unsupported universal allowance while the actual observations are still pending; the replacement should be visibly provisional, not silently zero.
12pointsAnd retain the selected-failure examples as examples. Their lack of a denominator does not make the failures imaginary, only unsuitable for estimating frequency by themselves.
7pointsEstimator has removed the every-bracket assumption and marked frequency and active time pending. Observation agreed, not completed yet.
0pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .