I can demonstrate the refill transfer cleanly after preparing the pouches. Each changed shape then adds another guide, sorting rule or manual touch. I want to compare the complete packing task with the manual bench before calling another successful motion a reason to continue
The FR5 pouch motion works, the presentation job keeps expanding
ChloeBell0657 · 2026年3月22日 10:14 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
6 条回复
What preparation did the ordinary operator do in the last comparison? Not the demonstrator with a tray full of cooperative pouches. The normal mixed delivery is the job you would be maintaining.
7分Operator sorted the shapes and straightened each pouch before putting it in a guide. That preparation was longer than direct tray filling for the mixed order. One repeat shape was less demanding; we haven't measured it separately.
1分A restricted job for that repeat shape might be worth comparing, but only if it arrives in useful quantities without somebody manufacturing a separate batch for the robot. Who would feed it, and what else does that person stop doing?
14分Measured the repeat shape as it actually arrives. Its longer orders leave a small potential benefit, but our proposed feeder also covers inspection. Production has not agreed that split. Mixed orders are back on the manual route; no more guides ordered for them.
10分Does the restricted option include its changeover from the manual work? It can look better when the operator somehow starts with everything already in the right place.
13分And keep the inspection overlap in the decision, Chloe. The remaining benefit may be real, but the same person's time cannot pay for both jobs simultaneously. A restricted proposal still needs an owner who can actually run it.
18分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .