Capture the actual destination and SDK environment under both logins. The same desktop shortcut can start different configurations. Leave the working controller settings alone while you compare.
简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。
the FR10 laptop works on one login only
PriyaBrown0916 · 2025年9月17日 22:22 UTC
20 条回复
The shortcut names match. I haven't checked their targets, which is mildly embarrassing given how many inherited shortcuts I've complained about. I'll get both launch details from IT.
5分Also compare the destination used by ping with the destination reported by the failed request. Don't assume both tests are going to the same address.
20分Our diagnostic laptop once took the unexpected adapter, so I'd ask IT to include the route under both accounts as well; I spent ages staring at a timeout before anyone checked that bit.
-4分Elliot, the ping was using the address in the maintenance sheet. The script gets its destination from a settings file. Grace, route comparison is in IT's check too.
19分Are those settings files identical?
5分No. Technician login points to the current controller address; maintenance login reads an older copy from its own profile. IT found it in the launch log.
17分That gives you a concrete difference to correct. Have IT check how the supported launcher is meant to find its configuration, otherwise copying the file once could leave you with the same problem for the next account.
11分IT proposed one managed configuration for this bench and an explicit destination in the diagnostic output. Not applied yet. The SDK versions match; the route to the intended controller is also the same in their comparison.
5分Could the old address belong to something else now?
13分Have IT account for that old destination. A timeout doesn't identify what was there, and the diagnostic should verify the returned controller identity rather than accepting any reply.
14分Priya, will a new maintenance account get the managed file automatically, or still need somebody who remembers this thread?
11分Grace, it's part of the managed bench setup in IT's proposal. Sofia and Elliot, they're checking the old address assignment; we have no successful identity reply from it and aren't treating it as a known controller.
18分Thank you. I was picturing a reused address.
3分Once the approved change is installed, repeat the documented identity check from both accounts and compare the returned identifier with the actual unit.
19分And try the supported launcher from a clean account during IT's check. Existing profiles sometimes hide a dependency the shared configuration was supposed to remove.
4分IT installed the launcher change. Both existing accounts retrieve the expected unit identity now. Imran, the clean-account check is still outstanding, so I'm leaving the handover open.
11分Already less mysterious than ping saying yes and everything else sulking; did they explain how future address changes get into that managed file?
11分Yes, Grace, IT owns that update with the bench configuration. Clean-account check passed too. The older destination belonged to a retired bench entry, according to their inventory. We removed that obsolete local file and closed the laptop issue. Thanks Elliot for questioning where each test was actually going.
11分Good. Put the destination and returned identifier in the support capture instructions as well; they'll make the next report considerably easier to read.
14分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .