the FR10 laptop works on one login only

PriyaBrown0916 · 17 Sept 2025, 22:22 UTC

Closed
PR
PriyaBrown0916
I've inherited an FR10 diagnostic laptop which retrieves controller identity under the technician's login but times out under our maintenance login. Ping answers on both. Same laptop and cable, though there may be settings tied to the account. Before anyone changes the controller address, I'd like a comparison that catches those differences.

20 replies

EL
ElliotBrown0944
Replying to PriyaBrown0916

Capture the actual destination and SDK environment under both logins. The same desktop shortcut can start different configurations. Leave the working controller settings alone while you compare.

4 points
PR
PriyaBrown0916
Replying to ElliotBrown0944

The shortcut names match. I haven't checked their targets, which is mildly embarrassing given how many inherited shortcuts I've complained about. I'll get both launch details from IT.

5 points
EL
ElliotBrown0944
Replying to PriyaBrown0916

Also compare the destination used by ping with the destination reported by the failed request. Don't assume both tests are going to the same address.

20 points
GR
GraceBarnes0581
Replying to PriyaBrown0916

Our diagnostic laptop once took the unexpected adapter, so I'd ask IT to include the route under both accounts as well; I spent ages staring at a timeout before anyone checked that bit.

-4 points
PR
PriyaBrown0916
Replying to GraceBarnes0581

Elliot, the ping was using the address in the maintenance sheet. The script gets its destination from a settings file. Grace, route comparison is in IT's check too.

19 points
EL
ElliotBrown0944
Replying to PriyaBrown0916

Are those settings files identical?

5 points
PR
PriyaBrown0916
Replying to ElliotBrown0944

No. Technician login points to the current controller address; maintenance login reads an older copy from its own profile. IT found it in the launch log.

17 points
IM
ImranAllen0305
Replying to PriyaBrown0916

That gives you a concrete difference to correct. Have IT check how the supported launcher is meant to find its configuration, otherwise copying the file once could leave you with the same problem for the next account.

11 points
PR
PriyaBrown0916
Replying to ImranAllen0305

IT proposed one managed configuration for this bench and an explicit destination in the diagnostic output. Not applied yet. The SDK versions match; the route to the intended controller is also the same in their comparison.

5 points
SO
SofiaBrown0891
Replying to PriyaBrown0916

Could the old address belong to something else now?

13 points
EL
ElliotBrown0944
Replying to SofiaBrown0891

Have IT account for that old destination. A timeout doesn't identify what was there, and the diagnostic should verify the returned controller identity rather than accepting any reply.

14 points
GR
GraceBarnes0581
Replying to PriyaBrown0916

Priya, will a new maintenance account get the managed file automatically, or still need somebody who remembers this thread?

11 points
PR
PriyaBrown0916
Replying to GraceBarnes0581

Grace, it's part of the managed bench setup in IT's proposal. Sofia and Elliot, they're checking the old address assignment; we have no successful identity reply from it and aren't treating it as a known controller.

18 points
SO
SofiaBrown0891
Replying to PriyaBrown0916

Thank you. I was picturing a reused address.

3 points
EL
ElliotBrown0944
Replying to PriyaBrown0916

Once the approved change is installed, repeat the documented identity check from both accounts and compare the returned identifier with the actual unit.

19 points
IM
ImranAllen0305
Replying to PriyaBrown0916

And try the supported launcher from a clean account during IT's check. Existing profiles sometimes hide a dependency the shared configuration was supposed to remove.

4 points
PR
PriyaBrown0916
Replying to ImranAllen0305

IT installed the launcher change. Both existing accounts retrieve the expected unit identity now. Imran, the clean-account check is still outstanding, so I'm leaving the handover open.

11 points
GR
GraceBarnes0581
Replying to PriyaBrown0916

Already less mysterious than ping saying yes and everything else sulking; did they explain how future address changes get into that managed file?

11 points
PR
PriyaBrown0916
Replying to GraceBarnes0581

Yes, Grace, IT owns that update with the bench configuration. Clean-account check passed too. The older destination belonged to a retired bench entry, according to their inventory. We removed that obsolete local file and closed the laptop issue. Thanks Elliot for questioning where each test was actually going.

11 points
EL
ElliotBrown0944
Replying to PriyaBrown0916

Good. Put the destination and returned identifier in the support capture instructions as well; they'll make the next report considerably easier to read.

14 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .