I'm reviewing bracket records for an FR5 welding proposal. One sheet says square in jig. Another says corrected and accepted. Neither identifies the free-state measurement before correction. Worth using these at all?
Which bracket measurement belongs to the part after unclamping?
NickBailey · 2025年8月9日 15:54 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
7 条回复
回复 NickBailey
Do the sheets identify the same bracket and drawing revision, or are you joining them because they came from the same job folder?
5分Same batch, no individual part marks. Drawing C on the inspection sheet. Jig note has no revision. I can't honestly connect a particular correction to that in-jig result.
25分回复 NickBailey
Use them to identify missing information for the review, but I would not combine those entries into a before-and-after result for one bracket
10分回复 NickBailey
Is the jig drawing still around, and does it show which faces locate the bracket?
-3分Toolroom found jig drawing B. It locates the base and one side face. Actual jig has an extra contact absent from B. They've taken that into the review.
4分回复 NickBailey
Did anybody explain the extra contact, or are we still looking at somebody's useful-looking alteration?
10分回复 NickBailey
And when that contact is assessed, include incoming fit-up and the released drawing-C dimensions in the trial plan, since an in-jig check alone would leave your original question unanswered
13分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .