简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

My UR5e housing acknowledgement has two possible owners after restart

NathanArcher0373 · 2026年8月22日 16:09 UTC

回复讨论
NA
NathanArcher0373
Python, PLC and controller logs disagree on time, and my application reused a job label after restart. A housing-verification timeout is clear. How do I reconstruct the acknowledgement without guessing its attempt?

6 条回复

CH
ChloeBrooks0831

Do any sources retain local sequence or session identity beyond that reused label?

4
NA
NathanArcher0373

Python has process starts and local ordering. The PLC acknowledgement carries only the reused job label.

16
NO
NoraBennett0757

Keep each source's order separately before aligning clocks, and look for independently identifiable shared events rather than using the disputed acknowledgement to prove its own place in the story.

6
CH
ChloeBrooks0831

Has the controller record owner checked for an independent request identifier or reception sequence?

-1
NA
NathanArcher0373

They found no distinguishing identity in the retained records. Application attempts are separable; the acknowledgement remains unassigned.

13
NO
NoraBennett0757

That is a legitimate reconstruction result; keep the original files and the unassigned event while the maintainer defines distinct future attempt identities, without rewriting the old evidence as though it contained them.

13

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。