My UR5e housing acknowledgement has two possible owners after restart

NathanArcher0373 · 22 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC

Reply to discussion
NA
NathanArcher0373
Python, PLC and controller logs disagree on time, and my application reused a job label after restart. A housing-verification timeout is clear. How do I reconstruct the acknowledgement without guessing its attempt?

6 replies

CH
ChloeBrooks0831
Replying to NathanArcher0373

Do any sources retain local sequence or session identity beyond that reused label?

4 points
NA
NathanArcher0373
Replying to ChloeBrooks0831

Python has process starts and local ordering. The PLC acknowledgement carries only the reused job label.

16 points
NO
NoraBennett0757
Replying to NathanArcher0373

Keep each source's order separately before aligning clocks, and look for independently identifiable shared events rather than using the disputed acknowledgement to prove its own place in the story.

6 points
CH
ChloeBrooks0831
Replying to NathanArcher0373

Has the controller record owner checked for an independent request identifier or reception sequence?

-1 points
NA
NathanArcher0373
Replying to ChloeBrooks0831

They found no distinguishing identity in the retained records. Application attempts are separable; the acknowledgement remains unassigned.

13 points
NO
NoraBennett0757
Replying to NathanArcher0373

That is a legitimate reconstruction result; keep the original files and the unassigned event while the maintainer defines distinct future attempt identities, without rewriting the old evidence as though it contained them.

13 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.