I'm keeping the full release sequence in our UR5e review. The alternating pattern still rotates component cases above gaps; what should packaging specify so the tool designer can assess the same supported arrangement?
Bearing regions are marked, but there is no permitted-bridging statement. One rotated end crosses a gap. The tool view shows carrying only, despite the requested release sequence.
Who owns the combined revision, Robin? I would ask packaging to state its support conclusion and tooling to return the opening and withdrawal in placement order against that same revision, including the actual pallet and partial loads.