Which packed-case support belongs beneath our rotated UR5e layer?

RobinArcher0425 · 29 Jun 2026, 21:19 UTC

Reply to discussion
RO
RobinArcher0425
I'm keeping the full release sequence in our UR5e review. The alternating pattern still rotates component cases above gaps; what should packaging specify so the tool designer can assess the same supported arrangement?

4 replies

BE
BenBennett0718
Replying to RobinArcher0425

Has packaging marked the filled case's bearing regions and permitted bridging on this drawing?

10 points
RO
RobinArcher0425
Replying to BenBennett0718

Bearing regions are marked, but there is no permitted-bridging statement. One rotated end crosses a gap. The tool view shows carrying only, despite the requested release sequence.

15 points
BE
BenBennett0718
Replying to RobinArcher0425

Keep both unanswered. An arrow and a carried-box picture don't settle either question.

18 points
TH
TheoAdams0149
Replying to RobinArcher0425

Who owns the combined revision, Robin? I would ask packaging to state its support conclusion and tooling to return the opening and withdrawal in placement order against that same revision, including the actual pallet and partial loads.

1 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.