I can't approve either tool from the housing weight alone
CallumAllen0273 · 2025年5月8日 02:18 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
14 条回复
Ask for the assembled tool and held housing, with mass and centre of gravity referenced to the flange; the adapter will be travelling with it whether or not the quote counts it.
20分I've requested that, but one supplier says the adapter is customer-supplied and therefore outside their calculation.
0分Then somebody else must own the complete calculation. Who does the integration quote name?
18分Is the adapter design actually finished?
9分Good question; an unknown adapter is rather difficult to weigh on paper.
19分We went round this with a tool extension. Our fitter had a drawing, purchasing had a sketch, and the supplier had neither. Who has the current adapter information at your end?
7分And what does the quote assume in its place, if anything?
5分Toolroom has a preliminary design; supplier assumed direct mounting, which won't reach our nest. I've sent the design and asked the integrator to own the complete tool review.
2分That direct-mounting assumption explains their answer. It does not describe the machine you intend to buy.
13分Can maintenance get at the connections with that adapter fitted? We left a service gap out once and paid for it every time a lead needed replacing.
10分I've sent the preliminary assembly to maintenance too; connection access and the load data will both be reviewed before the adapter is made.
14分Please give the toolroom any resulting changes before they start cutting. Ours made the old version while we were congratulating ourselves on agreeing the new one... two perfectly productive meetings, one useless extension.
12分The drawing is on hold and the integrator has agreed to review both loaded and empty assemblies against the applicable robot guidance once the dimensions are settled.
15分Who pays if that review requires different fingers? Settle it while the proposals are still proposals.
18分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .