简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
ReeceChen1167 · 2025年12月19日 16:24 UTC
Send the job version, affected sleeve and waiting step with the original clip. Ask their technical contact to specify the event history and signal details needed around that step. The missing lead-in should stay explicit.
24分The visible message says waiting for receiving fixture. I sent that with the job version. Seller forwarded it to its PLC contact, who has asked for the confirmation history.
8分Which confirmation? If that's a combined label, another history of the combined bit might leave everyone just as stuck.
16分They have not named the source condition yet. I will ask them to identify it before telling our technician what to collect.
3分Also ask for the interval before and after the wait, with how they want the video and history matched. A screenshot after somebody reseats the fixture would describe a different state.
19分And who gets the files on the other shift? Don't let a useful occurrence sit on someone's phone waiting for you.
11分Both shifts now have the named capture request and maintenance contact. The PLC contact specified the underlying fixture confirmation. No new matched occurrence yet; the old video still lacks that history.
1分Can the technician recognise the required interval in an existing example? Worth checking the request is usable before waiting for the next stop.
19分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .