The adapter delivered with our UR5e has a different reference from the one in the agreed plastic-sample trial. The seller has sent that same trial clip as evidence that the substitute will work. I have the supplied tooling set aside and photographs of both references. Before paying for a local assessment, I want the seller to explain the substitution against our actual tray-handling job, not against a catalogue mounting pattern.
Cannot accept our UR5e adapter substitution from the old sample clip
TheoCarter1019 · 2025年12月27日 15:23 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
5 条回复
We had a changeover that looked straightforward until the replacement assembly left the operator less room to see the part seat. The robot still reached it. I'd ask for the complete proposed assembly and handling sequence with this adapter, including the tray view the operator needs. Matching the mounting pattern is only one part of what you've bought.
18分The seller has provided a drawing identifying the substitute, but the sample-handling assessment still names the original adapter. I have asked them to reconcile those references before proposing another demonstration.
7分Are they actually offering a new assessment, Theo, or just sending whatever document you ask for one at a time? I'd want a named person bringing those pieces together.
3分Only separate documents so far. No named technical reviewer. That is the question I have now put back to them, with the two adapter references in the same message.
5分Then I'd leave the tooling aside as you have it. You might end up accepting the substitute after a proper review, but you shouldn't have to infer that review from a growing pile of attachments.
8分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .