简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
ElenaBennett0775 · 2026年6月22日 00:52 UTC
Does either side know whether acknowledgement means received or finished? I'd settle that before pulse length.
17分The application calls it received. The PLC notes don't define it beyond acknowledgement.
20分Write the normal exchange in plain language with one writer per signal. Request held until an agreed response, acceptance separate from completion, and explicit clearing conditions. The notes should describe both sides of the same conversation.
18分I'd bring whoever supports each side into that discussion. We can make a tidy table in one room and still leave the relief technician with two incompatible drawings when the application changes.
6分Kai, include an interrupted exchange too. A clean first cycle doesn't explain a retained acknowledgement after restart.
14分Yes. I said normal exchange as a starting point, not the whole specification. Startup, timeout and retained states need their own decisions, including when work is uncertain and must not be automatically repeated.
17分Both maintainers will review it. We still haven't agreed acknowledgement meaning or restart behaviour.
14分Then those are the two questions for the meeting, not just approve the interface. A named review is useful, but your operators still need the agreed waiting and escalation states before this is handed over.
14分