ElenaBennett0775 · 22 Jun 2026, 00:52 UTC
Does either side know whether acknowledgement means received or finished? I'd settle that before pulse length.
17 pointsThe application calls it received. The PLC notes don't define it beyond acknowledgement.
20 pointsWrite the normal exchange in plain language with one writer per signal. Request held until an agreed response, acceptance separate from completion, and explicit clearing conditions. The notes should describe both sides of the same conversation.
18 pointsI'd bring whoever supports each side into that discussion. We can make a tidy table in one room and still leave the relief technician with two incompatible drawings when the application changes.
6 pointsKai, include an interrupted exchange too. A clean first cycle doesn't explain a retained acknowledgement after restart.
14 pointsYes. I said normal exchange as a starting point, not the whole specification. Startup, timeout and retained states need their own decisions, including when work is uncertain and must not be automatically repeated.
17 pointsBoth maintainers will review it. We still haven't agreed acknowledgement meaning or restart behaviour.
14 pointsThen those are the two questions for the meeting, not just approve the interface. A named review is useful, but your operators still need the agreed waiting and escalation states before this is handed over.
14 pointsBy creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.