softer sleeve pads before we agree what a mark is

VictorChen1142 · 2025年12月25日 00:06 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

VI
VictorChen1142
Our UR5e tool supplier wants to try softer pads on anodised sleeves. The bench samples show dull arcs, but we have no agreed appearance check and no pictures from before those samples were handled. I would like a comparison that answers the finish question without losing sight of holding and release.

20 条回复

IS
IsabelBennett0735

Get quality to define the viewing method and identify an accepted sleeve plus the kinds of rejected marks that matter. Then examine the next samples before handling too. Your current arcs may be useful examples, but nobody can tell when they appeared from an after-only photograph.

17分
VI
VictorChen1142

The sleeves are retained. I can give quality those and untouched pieces from the same incoming batch. The arcs are not yet classified as rejects.

18分
PR
PriyaChen1177

And please don't let 'softer' settle the tooling choice by itself. I'd want the tool supplier to explain the proposed contact, what keeps the sleeve secure, and how it lets go into the next nest. A pretty sleeve that needs someone to peel it out of the fingers is a different problem, not a successful comparison.

12分
RO
RobinAllen0338

Will the same identified sleeve be checked before and after each proposed handling trial?

10分
NA
NaomiCarter1028

Compare the complete pad shape and support as well as material, Victor, because a softer replacement can spread contact or change where the sleeve sits; I'd want those changes shown before treating it as the same tool with a kinder surface

5分
VI
VictorChen1142

Robin, yes, each sample can stay identified. Naomi, the proposal changes thickness as well as material. I had been thinking of it as a simple swap, which is too simple.

13分
IS
IsabelBennett0735

Thickness belongs in that holding review. On the appearance side, don't photograph the candidates under different lamps because one looks nicer there. Agree the inspection method first, and use it consistently for the comparison.

18分
PR
PriyaChen1177

Isabel, I'd keep ordinary handling in that method too. Not deliberately rough treatment, but not a pampered single sleeve that arrives with someone holding it like a museum object.

4分
IS
IsabelBennett0735

Yes, but ordinary handling and the viewing method are separate descriptions. I meant stop changing how you look at the finish. The route through the proposed nests still needs to represent the job.

16分
VI
VictorChen1142

Our current samples were passed round at the bench. That is another reason I cannot blame the arcs on the pads. For the next comparison I can keep the planned handling route explicit.

19分
NA
NaomiCarter1028

The nests deserve a look too, since changing pads won't help a visible surface rubbing against the receiving contact; not saying that's happening here, only that the contact map shouldn't stop at the fingers

8分
RO
RobinAllen0338

Can you see the visible cylindrical face while the sleeve is in the receiving nest, Victor?

12分
VI
VictorChen1142

Not all of it. One side is hidden by the nest. The appearance check would need a defined presentation outside it, not just the picture of a seated sleeve.

4分
PR
PriyaChen1177

Then include that extra handling in the sample plan. I've seen a careful trial spoiled by everyone lifting the parts out differently for the final photo. You needn't turn it into a grand ceremony. Just know which contact happened during the proposed process and which happened while you were trying to inspect it.

0分
IS
IsabelBennett0735

Priya, that's useful. I'd ask quality to choose how the sample is supported for viewing, so the inspection itself doesn't add a fresh unknown on the face we're arguing about.

4分
VI
VictorChen1142

Quality will define that presentation and the finish decision. Tooling will cover both nests and the thicker pads. No material choice yet; we are still agreeing the comparison.

4分
NA
NaomiCarter1028

Will the toolmaker show the sleeve's proposed held position with those thicker pads, rather than reusing the current position in the drawing?

4分
VI
VictorChen1142

I've asked for that. Their sketch still shows the original held position without explaining whether it changes.

0分
RO
RobinAllen0338

Thanks for spelling out the hidden side, Victor.

18分
PR
PriyaChen1177

I'd keep that sketch question open before ordering, Victor. The pads might be a good idea. You just haven't got enough yet to say what the complete tool will do with them.

0分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .