简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
LeoArcher0362 · 2026年8月24日 14:36 UTC
Which pickup improved: from the fixture, or a later pickup from the receiving tray? Those are different claims.
13分And keep the tray replacement in the trial account. It is part of ordinary use, even if the short run before it looked encouraging.
13分Later pickup from the receiving tray. I compressed the whole sequence into transfer and made that unclear. The source-fixture pickup was not the part I saw improve.
22分Was the miss a sleeve seated differently in the tray, or a correctly seated sleeve being approached differently?
18分Hana's question comes before deciding the locator moved. Replacing a tray also changes which pockets and surfaces are in use.
11分The missed sleeve stands higher before approach. I have a view of that, but no equivalent view from the earlier runs. Maintenance is checking the replacement tray against the specified pocket detail.
18分That is enough to retain the failure without inventing its cause. Your earlier few runs don't establish whether every sleeve was seated correctly either.
9分Agreed with Anil. Keep the improvement as an observation under those earlier conditions, not a percentage reduction in misses.
6分Replacement tray has a shallower pocket insert than the specified one. It is held out of the setup. The report now separates the limited earlier observation from this identified mismatch; no claim that changing the insert has fixed the job.
14分Who checks the insert identity when trays return from stores? That mismatch can reappear even after this one is corrected.
8分