the FR5 sleeve pause needs a matched event report

KaiBrooks0802 · 2025年9月2日 04:37 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

KA
KaiBrooks0802
I have another sleeve-handling support query, this one on an FR5 tray loader; the seller through Alibaba has my video but no matching message or step, and I want to correct that gap without borrowing evidence from a different station.

13 条回复

AI
AishaBell0692

One of our tickets improved when we tied the video to the exact message and sequence step. Put this station's equipment and fixture references at the top, then ask support which input trace they need for that occurrence.

14分
KA
KaiBrooks0802

Our technician has the station and program references, but the video starts after the message clears; I have asked for a fresh matched capture and told support the old clip's limitation

18分
JA
JamieBrown0904

Can the message be recovered from the existing event history? Worth asking the technician before waiting for another stop, though it would still need linking to the video time.

4分
KA
KaiBrooks0802

Event history has several waits and I cannot link one confidently to that clip, so I have sent them as separate records with that uncertainty stated

9分
AI
AishaBell0692

Then let support say which wait needs more detail. A list of old events can help them ask a narrower question, without pretending one of them is definitely the filmed stop.

12分
CH
ChenBennett0703

Who is collecting the evidence when this happens on a different shift? We lost useful messages because everyone thought the person who opened the ticket would be there to photograph them.

17分
KA
KaiBrooks0802

Both shift technicians now have the capture note, Chen, and support has requested the receiving-tray confirmation state with the active step and message

6分
JA
JamieBrown0904

Has a new occurrence been captured with those details yet? Curious whether it points to the same wait as the older event list.

13分
KA
KaiBrooks0802

Not yet, Jamie; we have the collection plan but no new matched event to compare

15分
AI
AishaBell0692

Keep the request open as awaiting evidence. I would also ask controls what contributes to receiving-tray confirmation, so the technician knows which physical area the eventual message refers to.

18分
CA
CalebAllen0319

Does the removable tray have its own identification?

10分
KA
KaiBrooks0802

Yes, Caleb, tray T8 is identified separately; controls says confirmation includes tray presence and the selected setup, and both values are now on the requested trace

20分
CH
ChenBennett0703

Useful to have both. Keep the operator's own description beside the trace too, since they may notice a tray-change problem that the screen compresses into one unhelpful word.

5分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .