I have another sleeve-handling support query, this one on an FR5 tray loader; the seller through Alibaba has my video but no matching message or step, and I want to correct that gap without borrowing evidence from a different station.
One of our tickets improved when we tied the video to the exact message and sequence step. Put this station's equipment and fixture references at the top, then ask support which input trace they need for that occurrence.
Our technician has the station and program references, but the video starts after the message clears; I have asked for a fresh matched capture and told support the old clip's limitation
Can the message be recovered from the existing event history? Worth asking the technician before waiting for another stop, though it would still need linking to the video time.
Then let support say which wait needs more detail. A list of old events can help them ask a narrower question, without pretending one of them is definitely the filmed stop.
Who is collecting the evidence when this happens on a different shift? We lost useful messages because everyone thought the person who opened the ticket would be there to photograph them.
Both shift technicians now have the capture note, Chen, and support has requested the receiving-tray confirmation state with the active step and message
Keep the request open as awaiting evidence. I would also ask controls what contributes to receiving-tray confirmation, so the technician knows which physical area the eventual message refers to.
Yes, Caleb, tray T8 is identified separately; controls says confirmation includes tray presence and the selected setup, and both values are now on the requested trace
Useful to have both. Keep the operator's own description beside the trace too, since they may notice a tray-change problem that the screen compresses into one unhelpful word.