简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

our fr5 blank fits the door without its tool

AdaCarter0999 · 2026年2月10日 10:04 UTC

已关闭
AD
AdaCarter0999
Our aluminium blank clears the machine opening on paper. Where should the complete gripper enter this comparison?

10 条回复

PR
PriyaBell0655

Before selecting the arm position. Use the identified body, fingers, adapter and connections with the held blank, surveyed open door and fixture. Check withdrawal and the empty return as separate tool states.

7
AD
AdaCarter0999

Tool supplier has sent two connection orientations. Integrator is adding both to the surveyed opening.

6
EL
ElliotBennett0770

We found the rear fitting, not the finger, chose the bad position. Has either complete orientation survived the first check?

2
AD
AdaCarter0999

Rear-facing one conflicts with the door. Side-facing one clears the loaded withdrawal in the model.

17
FE
FelixBaker0458

What about the empty return with the fingers open? The loaded result is useful, but it does not settle the route back into the machine.

8
PR
PriyaBell0655

And preserve the setter's access. A surviving robot route can still occupy the fixture-change space.

18
AD
AdaCarter0999

Empty return conflicts at the handle. Setter's space is clear. Integrator is considering a different base position.

8
EL
ElliotBennett0770

That was the cheaper option to study in our room, though yours may differ. Keep the same complete tool in the new comparison so the apparent improvement has a fair baseline.

19
AD
AdaCarter0999

Shifted base clears both routes in the model. Maintenance panel access is now restricted, so it is still provisional.

23
FE
FelixBaker0458

Has maintenance defined the space it actually needs there? That can decide whether this candidate can change or should be dropped.

16

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .