AdaCarter0999 · 10 Feb 2026, 10:04 UTC
Before selecting the arm position. Use the identified body, fingers, adapter and connections with the held blank, surveyed open door and fixture. Check withdrawal and the empty return as separate tool states.
7 pointsTool supplier has sent two connection orientations. Integrator is adding both to the surveyed opening.
6 pointsWe found the rear fitting, not the finger, chose the bad position. Has either complete orientation survived the first check?
2 pointsRear-facing one conflicts with the door. Side-facing one clears the loaded withdrawal in the model.
17 pointsWhat about the empty return with the fingers open? The loaded result is useful, but it does not settle the route back into the machine.
8 pointsAnd preserve the setter's access. A surviving robot route can still occupy the fixture-change space.
18 pointsEmpty return conflicts at the handle. Setter's space is clear. Integrator is considering a different base position.
8 pointsThat was the cheaper option to study in our room, though yours may differ. Keep the same complete tool in the new comparison so the apparent improvement has a fair baseline.
19 pointsShifted base clears both routes in the model. Maintenance panel access is now restricted, so it is still provisional.
23 pointsHas maintenance defined the space it actually needs there? That can decide whether this candidate can change or should be dropped.
16 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .