FR5 planning images have moving streaks labelled scratches. No commissioned station yet. I want the physical references sorted before the camera gets taught our guesses; what's missing from the handover?
Cover captions say scratch before anyone has checked the cover
GraceBell0668 · 2026年6月27日 04:51 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
6 条回复
Retained covers, identified regions and a physical decision under the appearance requirement. Keep the different presentations linked. The movement of a streak is worth investigating, but it does not tell you whether the surrounding surface is acceptable.
18分Covers retained, regions not linked yet. Some images are tight crops, so even their arrows aren't easy to place back on the metal.
22分Recover the full views before treating those crops as reference evidence. A crop can be perfectly sharp and still be a picture of an unidentified bit of cover. I'd rather repeat an uncertain capture than let the next tutor guess its physical location.
19分回复 AlexChen1168
Full views recovered for one session. The other crops have no reliable parent image, so that session is excluded from confirmed references, not silently assigned to whichever cover looks nearest.
15分That narrows the provenance problem. Quality still needs to decide the retained surfaces, and the imaging comparison needs known regions rather than the most dramatic crop. No reason to tune thresholds from this set yet.
21分Who has the covers while those decisions are pending? Don't lose the physical reference next.
11分