GraceBell0668 · 27 Jun 2026, 04:51 UTC
Retained covers, identified regions and a physical decision under the appearance requirement. Keep the different presentations linked. The movement of a streak is worth investigating, but it does not tell you whether the surrounding surface is acceptable.
18 pointsCovers retained, regions not linked yet. Some images are tight crops, so even their arrows aren't easy to place back on the metal.
22 pointsRecover the full views before treating those crops as reference evidence. A crop can be perfectly sharp and still be a picture of an unidentified bit of cover. I'd rather repeat an uncertain capture than let the next tutor guess its physical location.
19 pointsFull views recovered for one session. The other crops have no reliable parent image, so that session is excluded from confirmed references, not silently assigned to whichever cover looks nearest.
15 pointsThat narrows the provenance problem. Quality still needs to decide the retained surfaces, and the imaging comparison needs known regions rather than the most dramatic crop. No reason to tune thresholds from this set yet.
21 pointsWho has the covers while those decisions are pending? Don't lose the physical reference next.
11 pointsBy creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.