简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

I need region-level evidence behind our FR5 cover scratch labels

LinAllen0270 · 2026年8月23日 01:07 UTC

回复讨论
LI
LinAllen0270
I want the physical judgement tied to actual surface regions, not a whole-cover label from one bright line. My FR5 polished-cover images show streaks moving with presentation. How should we establish references before tuning this uncommissioned station?

5 条回复

GR
GraceBell0668

Keep each physical cover identified and have the appearance owner judge the disputed regions under the required viewing conditions. Link those decisions to images without treating a moving streak as proof either way.

18
LI
LinAllen0270

Quality has judged the retained covers. One has an acceptable bright finish region and a separate rejected edge mark. The original scratch caption pointed at the acceptable region, so it was misleading twice.

4
GR
GraceBell0668

Keep both region decisions with that cover. Next compare whether the edge mark remains visible through the intended presentation range, while the accepted finish does not become a false reject.

12
LI
LinAllen0270

We have corrected the reference map, but the edge mark is obscured in one existing view. Imaging owner is comparing coverage before threshold work. The physical label problem is settled for these covers, not the camera arrangement.

11
GR
GraceBell0668

Does that obscured view lose the edge geometrically, or wash it out in brightness? Worth separating before changing the holder and lighting together.

18

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。