I want the physical judgement tied to actual surface regions, not a whole-cover label from one bright line. My FR5 polished-cover images show streaks moving with presentation. How should we establish references before tuning this uncommissioned station?
I need region-level evidence behind our FR5 cover scratch labels
LinAllen0270 · 2026年8月23日 01:07 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
5 条回复
回复 LinAllen0270
Keep each physical cover identified and have the appearance owner judge the disputed regions under the required viewing conditions. Link those decisions to images without treating a moving streak as proof either way.
18分Quality has judged the retained covers. One has an acceptable bright finish region and a separate rejected edge mark. The original scratch caption pointed at the acceptable region, so it was misleading twice.
4分回复 LinAllen0270
Keep both region decisions with that cover. Next compare whether the edge mark remains visible through the intended presentation range, while the accepted finish does not become a false reject.
12分We have corrected the reference map, but the edge mark is obscured in one existing view. Imaging owner is comparing coverage before threshold work. The physical label problem is settled for these covers, not the camera arrangement.
11分回复 LinAllen0270
Does that obscured view lose the edge geometrically, or wash it out in brightness? Worth separating before changing the holder and lighting together.
18分