简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Why is one loose panel enough to approve our stack pickup?

OmarBell0665 · 2026年3月1日 14:01 UTC

已关闭
OM
OmarBell0665
The proposed FR10 vacuum tool held a loose stainless cover panel on the supplier's bench. Useful, but our panels come from a stack, and I have had two stick together by hand. The report doesn't show how the free edge stays supported on the way to the nest either. Am I asking for a different trial, or should that have been part of this one?

5 条回复

NO
NoahArcher0368

A supplier once showed us a single sheet lifted from little blocks, which was a perfectly clear demonstration of lifting from little blocks. We needed sheets separated from a stack. I would ask them to demonstrate your starting condition explicitly, including what happens when two arrive together and how the tool releases into the real receiver. Otherwise everyone can keep agreeing the vacuum works while answering different questions.

14
OM
OmarBell0665

Little blocks here too, Noah. I hadn't even mentioned them because I was concentrating on the cups. Thanks, that gives me a much clearer way to explain what's missing.

19
NO
NoahArcher0368

Keep the support question in there as well. Separation can get all the attention once somebody says double sheet.

23
OM
OmarBell0665

The supplier has withdrawn the 'stack handling demonstrated' line. They only tested the isolated panel. We have agreed a new trial using our stack samples and receiving nest, with support and double-panel handling included in the brief.

6
NO
NoahArcher0368

Who supplies the awkward stack samples, Omar? Not just the freshly separated ones that happen to be easiest.

8

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .