简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Planning for 89, judging from mismatched demos (Universal Robots UR5e)

WillBrooks0835 · 2026年7月15日 13:28 UTC

回复讨论
WI
WillBrooks0835
I'm comparing Universal Robots UR5e with other candidates: tray-to-fixture loading with a rigid plastic cap in a compact parts handling area, with 89 planned. One demo used a tidy tray; another used our awkward workshop tray. Both looked promising. I don't think the videos answer the same question.

7 条回复

EL
ElliotAllen0335

Got separate notes for misses and tray nudges? That could show how much preparation is propping up the transfer results.

11
WI
WillBrooks0835

The notes are scrappy, but they distinguish the tray adjustments that aren't obvious in the footage. They also show most missed pickups occurring after tray replacement across the candidates.

8
EL
ElliotAllen0335

A shared tray trial sounds useful, with ordinary tray replacement included. Set acceptable placement and operator involvement in advance, and log both against each candidate.

13
DA
DavidBrown0954

@ElliotAllen0335 On our own transfer job, the uninterrupted run hid a fiddly locating step. Asking a second operator to replace the tray made that painfully obvious.

20
WI
WillBrooks0835

@DavidBrown0954 Robot cost or fixture cost? Our meeting keeps getting stuck there.

25
DA
DavidBrown0954

In my own comparison, we included the cost in the complete package and identified its source as fixture work. How we categorised it didn't change the need to fund it.

4
EL
ElliotAllen0335

Keeping the same gripper would make the comparison fair too. That removes another variable while you sort out the tray issue.

10

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。