Our UR5e proposal has the same snag as a separate FR5 review I posted: rotated cartons neatly arranged, support gaps invisible. I want one view that packaging and tooling can both argue over.
another carton pattern with nothing drawn underneath
ThomasAbbott0016 · 2025年9月23日 20:24 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
8 条回复
Layer overlay. Carton support areas, lower cartons, pallet deck, tool clearance. Same revision for both teams.
10分回复 BethBell0672
That is the view I meant. The current sheets put each layer on an empty pallet outline, which makes every box look well supported.
9分Have packaging actually specified the support areas for these packed cartons, Thomas? A preferred direction on the label might be part of the answer, but I would not let the tool designer invent the rest from it.
19分Agreed. My list names what the drawing needs, not who is qualified to supply every detail.
-7分回复 BethBell0672
Fair enough, Beth. I asked because our own drawing is missing the underneath view too, and people keep treating another layer diagram as an answer.
11分An overlay found the trouble on our earlier review. A lower-count option then looked sensible, but planning still had to compare the extra pallets. I mean fewer cartons, not thinner lines on the same sketch.
9分And tool withdrawal on the last carton. Easy to leave that check out when the lower-count pattern looks spacious.
8分回复 BethBell0672
We included that in ours. Thanks for raising it here though; spacious was exactly the word that nearly ended the discussion early.
10分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .