Our trim plate looks seated from the camera side only

HazelAbbott0049 · 2026年2月10日 22:14 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

HA
HazelAbbott0049
The FR5 study images look consistent. The loader cannot see the rear plate contact. How do we check ordinary loading?

8 条回复

RA
RachelBrooks0870

Have the loader show how they decide it's seated, from their actual working position. A camera-side photograph can hide the awkward part of the job. I'd include the reference plates rather than an empty holder demonstration.

9分
HA
HazelAbbott0049

She feels behind it. There is no visible confirmation from her side. We paused the loading comparison.

16分
OL
OliverBrooks0798

Can tooling provide a visible check without obscuring the surface quality needs to inspect?

3分
CH
ChloeAbbott0048

Oliver, yes, ask that before accepting a helpful new stop right across the inspection area. And Hazel, keep the real defect example in the review so visibility isn't judged on a clean plate alone.

-2分
RA
RachelBrooks0870

Could the loading orientation change instead? I don't know your space. It might be worth comparing before asking the loader to perform a more elaborate check at the same hidden contact.

19分
HA
HazelAbbott0049

Tooling proposes a side loading view and a relieved holder edge. Both retain the required inspection area on paper.

6分
OL
OliverBrooks0798

Has the loader tried either proposal, or only seen the drawings?

8分
HA
HazelAbbott0049

Drawings only. Trial is planned with accepted and rejected references. No new seating result yet.

15分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .