HazelAbbott0049 · 10 Feb 2026, 22:14 UTC
Have the loader show how they decide it's seated, from their actual working position. A camera-side photograph can hide the awkward part of the job. I'd include the reference plates rather than an empty holder demonstration.
9 pointsShe feels behind it. There is no visible confirmation from her side. We paused the loading comparison.
16 pointsCan tooling provide a visible check without obscuring the surface quality needs to inspect?
3 pointsOliver, yes, ask that before accepting a helpful new stop right across the inspection area. And Hazel, keep the real defect example in the review so visibility isn't judged on a clean plate alone.
-2 pointsCould the loading orientation change instead? I don't know your space. It might be worth comparing before asking the loader to perform a more elaborate check at the same hidden contact.
19 pointsTooling proposes a side loading view and a relieved holder edge. Both retain the required inspection area on paper.
6 pointsHas the loader tried either proposal, or only seen the drawings?
8 pointsDrawings only. Trial is planned with accepted and rejected references. No new seating result yet.
15 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .