简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

What belongs in a useful arrival condition report? (Fairino FR5)

RaviChen1172 · 2026年6月8日 06:56 UTC

回复讨论
RA
RaviChen1172
Our Fairino FR5 arrived from an unnamed seller in China in a crate with a crushed corner and shifted internal supports. I can see damage near the controller enclosure. We bought it for transferring inspection trays; I haven't powered it. I've photographed the delivery and kept the packaging, but the seller's reply just says to switch it on.

17 条回复

MA
MayaChen1171

@RaviChen1172 Check whether your photographs include the shipment label and supports as well as a wider view of the damaged area. That context would help a reviewer interpret the visible condition.

6
RA
RaviChen1172

Yes. I've got the crushed corner and shifted restraint before unpacking, plus wider photos around the controller enclosure. I kept the delivery paperwork too.

7
MA
MayaChen1171

Send that set with a request for a qualified condition assessment and handling instructions. Leave it unpowered; 'switch it on' isn't an inspection procedure.

19
RA
RaviChen1172

Should I call it transport damage? I know how it looked on arrival, not where the knock happened.

16
FE
FelixBaker0458

Report what you observed on receipt. Establishing responsibility for the damage isn't necessary to describe the crate condition and visible marks accurately.

16
MA
MayaChen1171

@FelixBaker0458 The restraint displacement suggests that an impact reached the equipment itself. Include that image in the assessment request alongside the external crate photographs.

21
CH
ChloeBell0657

@MayaChen1171 It shows a shifted restraint. We don't know the force path or when it moved. Don't turn the photograph into a diagnosis.

-1
MA
MayaChen1171

You're right; my interpretation went beyond the photograph. The restraint displacement should be reported as an observation for the assessor to evaluate.

9
YA
YasminBennett0702

@MayaChen1171 Could a power-on test establish whether the visible damage affects the equipment?

17
MA
MayaChen1171

@YasminBennett0702 Even successful startup would leave possible hidden damage unanswered. The visible condition warrants an agreed assessment method before the equipment is energized.

19
RA
RaviChen1172

@MayaChen1171 That's my worry. I don't want 'it lights up' becoming the entire condition report. It's staying off.

17
FE
FelixBaker0458

For a damaged machine delivery I handled separately, the reviewer relied on the wider images to locate the damage. My close-up alone didn't provide enough context.

25
RA
RaviChen1172

@FelixBaker0458 Would labelling the images help, or should I leave the originals alone?

14
FE
FelixBaker0458

@RaviChen1172 Keep the originals and label copies. Simple filenames or arrows can help, as long as they don't cover the detail you're asking them to inspect.

24
CH
ChloeBell0657

Keep arrival observations distinct from anything found during unpacking. Same report is fine; pretending you saw it all at the door isn't.

-1
RA
RaviChen1172

I still have no suitable assessment of the visible damage. Our equipment is unpowered, and the packaging is being retained.

10
MA
MayaChen1171

@RaviChen1172 Without an assessment of the reported damage, your decision to leave the equipment unpowered remains consistent.

10

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。