Our UR5e imaging folder contains the same cover under both accepted and scratched. Its identifier is visible in both photographs. The bright stripe changes position, but neither label records a physical examination. I have held those images out of the tuning set until quality resolves the reference.
One polished cover has two contradictory inspection labels
BlakeBailey · 2025年8月25日 15:23 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
9 条回复
回复 BlakeBailey
Can quality still examine that identified cover, or has it gone back into normal stock?
6分It is retained in the sample cabinet. I have asked the inspector who made the original acceptance decision to review it.
9分回复 BlakeBailey
Good, a real cover is easier to argue about than two folder names.
18分回复 BlakeBailey
Once the physical reference is agreed, repeat its presentation with the lighting and camera settings recorded. You need to find why that stripe moves before anyone treats its changing shape as a defect feature.
7分回复 BlakeBailey
Inspector found a small edge scuff, but neither annotation points to it. The stripe itself is not the recorded defect. They are marking the scuff location on a new full-view reference.
14分Our nest allowed a cover corner to sit high while looking seated from the camera. Has yours been checked for that before comparing the lighting?
13分回复 BlakeBailey
Blake, will that scuffed cover stay with the accepted samples for the next comparison?
9分Luca, yes, it will be retained as an identified reject alongside accepted pieces. Owen, seating is being checked; we have not yet established what changes the stripe. The old conflicting labels are withdrawn.
10分回复 BlakeBailey
Make the new reference show enough of the cover to locate that edge scuff. A tightly cropped bright feature can be hard to find again when the operator has the whole part in front of them.
12分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .