One polished cover has two contradictory inspection labels

It is retained in the sample cabinet. I have asked the inspector who made the original acceptance decision to review it.

Good, a real cover is easier to argue about than two folder names.

Once the physical reference is agreed, repeat its presentation with the lighting and camera settings recorded. You need to find why that stripe moves before anyone treats its changing shape as a defect feature.

Inspector found a small edge scuff, but neither annotation points to it. The stripe itself is not the recorded defect. They are marking the scuff location on a new full-view reference.

Our nest allowed a cover corner to sit high while looking seated from the camera. Has yours been checked for that before comparing the lighting?

Blake, will that scuffed cover stay with the accepted samples for the next comparison?

Luca, yes, it will be retained as an identified reject alongside accepted pieces. Owen, seating is being checked; we have not yet established what changes the stripe. The old conflicting labels are withdrawn.

Make the new reference show enough of the cover to locate that edge scuff. A tightly cropped bright feature can be hard to find again when the operator has the whole part in front of them.